Re: VLANs, Cisco Catalyst 5500 (CatOS) and a Realtek 8100 series
Derek Fedel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.vlan |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Some other information. to me, it looks as though the vlan encap is
set to 1q.. I'll check into the eepro card though. Any other ideas
maybe?
VLAN Name Status IfIndex Mod/Ports, Vlans
---- -------------------------------- --------- ------- ------------------------
1 default active 5
2 VLAN0002 active 826
3 VLAN0003 active 828 3/3-24
4/1-24
5/1-24
6/1-24
7/1-24
8/1-24
9/1-24
10/1-24
11/1-24
12/1-24
1002 fddi-default active 6
1003 token-ring-default active 9
1004 fddinet-default active 7
1005 trnet-default active 8
VLAN Type SAID MTU Parent RingNo BrdgNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2
---- ----- ---------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ---- -------- ------ ------
1 enet 100001 1500 - - - - - 0 0
2 enet 100002 1500 - - - - - 0 0
3 enet 100003 1500 - - - - - 0 0
1002 fddi 101002 1500 - - - - - 0 0
1003 trcrf 101003 1500 - - - - - 0 0
1004 fdnet 101004 1500 - - - - - 0 0
1005 trbrf 101005 1500 - - - ibm - 0 0
VLAN DynCreated RSPAN
---- ---------- --------
1 static disabled
2 static disabled
3 static disabled
1002 static disabled
1003 static disabled
1004 static disabled
1005 static disabled
VLAN AREHops STEHops Backup CRF 1q VLAN
---- ------- ------- ---------- -------
1003 7 7 off
adm.2 VID: 2 REORDER_HDR: 1 dev->priv_flags: 1
total frames received 3058
total bytes received 262343
Broadcast/Multicast Rcvd 104
total frames transmitted 1060
total bytes transmitted 107868
total headroom inc 0
total encap on xmit 1060
Device: adm
INGRESS priority mappings: 0:0 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:0
EGRESSS priority Mappings:
istanbul:~# cat /proc/net/vlan/int.3
int.3 VID: 3 REORDER_HDR: 1 dev->priv_flags: 1
total frames received 0
total bytes received 0
Broadcast/Multicast Rcvd 0
total frames transmitted 3805
total bytes transmitted 175030
total headroom inc 0
total encap on xmit 3669
Device: int
INGRESS priority mappings: 0:0 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:0
EGRESSS priority Mappings:
* - indicates vtp domain mismatch
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
-------- ----------- ------------- ------------ -----------
3/1 on dot1q trunking 3
3/2 on dot1q trunking 2
Port Vlans allowed on trunk
-------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
3/1 1,3
3/2 2
Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain
-------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
3/1 1,3
3/2 2
Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
-------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
3/1 1,3
3/2 2
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 05:57:13 +0100, Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:46:47PM -0800, Derek Fedel wrote:
> > The NIC connected to the switch is a Realtek 8100 series that I
> > believe should support the extra MTU size (8139too driver)
>
> It will, but I would suggest getting an Intel card instead, they
> don't cost a lot and are higher quality cards. Use the e100 or e1000
> driver in the kernel though, not the old eepro100 driver.
>
>
> > Its odd, I set up the vlans I want on the switch, set up the
> > trunking on the port that the firewall is connected to, and vconfig
> > the vlans to the interface on the firewall, but once I bring the
> > vlan'd interface up, it will transmit packets, but not actually
> > receive anything except for what tcpdump identifies as "Unknown IPX
> > packets". hooray. Anyone have any ideas? I'll be glad to supply
> > more information if need be. I suspect an MTU issue, but I'm not
> > too sure.
>
> Is trunking specifically set to use dot1q? If not, I believe Cisco
> prefers their own trunking protocol ISL, which is incompatible with
> 802.1Q.
>
> //Peter
> _______________________________________________
> Vlan mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.lanforge.com/mailman/listinfo/vlan
>