Re: 3C905C-TX-M vs 3C905CX-TXM
Donald Becker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.vortex.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 [email protected] wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 12:43:36PM -0400, Donald Becker wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 [email protected] wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 02:18:43PM +0200, Bogdan Costescu wrote: > > > > On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > > > The newer one, 3C905C-TX-M, doesn't get detected on a "very old" > > > > What do you mean by getting detected ? By the driver or by the PCI > > > > subsystem ? Does it appear when you do 'lspci -vvv' ? [[ Answer: no ]] > > Yup, it appears that you want the "missing-hardware@localhost" mailing > > list. (If a card doesn't show up PCI configuration space, the driver > > cannot detect it. It's likely the card is not plugged into the PCI slot.) > > and I'am on drugs and just imagine it is there ;-) Yup. Drugs. Drugs are bad. (See "South Park" episode.) > Same PC, same PCI slot, same kernel, same lspci but card is the > older one (3C905C-TX-M), lspci reports this bit as well: I can't think of a PCI change that prevent detection, except for voltage requirement. And PCI slots are keyed to indicate voltage support. Anybody else have an idea about a cause for PCI non-detection? -- Donald Becker [email protected] Scyld Computing Corporation http://www.scyld.com 410 Severn Ave. Suite 210 Second Generation Beowulf Clusters Annapolis MD 21403 410-990-9993 _______________________________________________ vortex mailing list [email protected] http://www.scyld.com/mailman/listinfo/vortex