Re: [Fwd: problem with dual 3com card]

"maillists (josef ""radinger)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.drivers.vortex.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
i forced the switch into full_duplex and tried to force the card, too
(via full_duplex=1,1)
its clear that the combination autoneg + force does not work, but why 

my experiences here:

switch	card	result
----------------------
auto	auto	works
auto	force	does not work (but this is ok)
force	auto	does not work (but this is ok)
force	force	does not work (imho not ok)

if i try force+force i loose the link as mentioned by mii-diag:
Basic registers of MII PHY #24:  3000 7809 0040 6177 0541 0000 0000
0000.
 Basic mode control register 0x3000: Auto-negotiation enabled.
 Basic mode status register 0x7809 ... 7809.
   Link status: not established.

and i see "Auto-negotiation enabled.", which should not be true.
or am i missing something?
does forcing mean, that i still have autoneg, but with less available
options?
and how would i force card into 100FD, just by using module parameters?
0x204 is only valid for 3c595, but not for my 3c982.

yours
josef


On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 20:00, Bogdan Costescu wrote:
> On 4 Jun 2003, maillists (josef radinger) wrote:
> 
> > 3c59x was loaded with full_duplex debug=7
> 
> ... and it gave you what you wanted to:
> 
> > I'm advertising 0541: Flow-control 100baseTx-FD 10baseT-FD
> 
> It's only advertising full-duplex modes.
> 
> > and the switch was on full_duplex
> 
> Do you mean that you _force_ the switch to full-duplex ? This would 
> actually be consistent with:
> 
> > Link partner capability is 0000:.
> >   Negotiation did not complete.
> 
> You can't use autonegotiation at one end (card) and force at the other 
> end (switch). Put the switch into autonegotiation/nway mode and everything 
> should work even without any mii-diag help or kernel parameters...

_______________________________________________
vortex mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.scyld.com/mailman/listinfo/vortex
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.