other ap based on the ISL3893: where's uclinux source code?
Henrion Benjamin <[email protected]> Fri, 2 Jan 2004 21:28:05 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.wireless.access-point |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20040102202805.GA9325@localhost> |
Some APs running this chipset: http://www.arguscorp.com/xi2080.asp http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/News_story_250.php http://www.computex.com.tw/news_archive_detail.asp?index=6378 http://www.avgs-tech.co.uk/zcomax/xg2000.htm http://www.cnvvv.com/MyProduct/u_Product/Include.asp?ID=86&ListName=54M%E6%97%A0%E7%BA%BF%E4%BA%A7%E5%93%81 http://www.vastvan.com.tw/11g1.html A comment on LWN: http://lwn.net/Articles/62606/ Linux Gaining Support In Embedded Systems (TechWeb) (Posted Dec 11, 2003 19:03 UTC (Thu) by erich) (Post reply) Typical "embedded" Linux systems are kind of "homegrown"... the one i've seen - the SDK of Intersil for the ISL3893, which is - although mostly GPL - NOT publicly available - is based upon a fork of uclinux around late 1998. It sucks. They hacked their logging into every application, disabled features and made many many mistakes (wrong #ifdefs and such) while doing that. Instead of providing proper patches they ship ancient versions... They also did not push back their changes into uclinux, so they could be intergrated into future releases (such as hardware information that uclinux could build out-of-the-box for that hardware) And zcom, taiwanese manufcaturer further modified the kernel without releasing source... Manufacturers suck. They havn't understand Open Source, and that is why they have all these problems. Why Intersil does not give their modifications to the kernel and BSDL files public? -- Benjamin Henrion <[email protected]> http://bh.udev.org