Re: USR2450 implimentation
"Roy" <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Aug 2004 23:57:04 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.wireless.access-point |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001f01c47e53$6cb6ef50$030aa8c0@t> |
As I found on inet, wep is quite useless anyway. it takes about 1-3 days to hack in. you can use cipe which is supposed to be secure. and is more or less implemented in latest flash. (it is same as ipsec) I use unsecure network, and performance is still bad, 16mhz(bogomips) cpu is capable for 350kbytes/s if you set it to 32mhz it can transfer little more than 400kbytes/s but requires heatsink on cpu. this is between same type aps (USR2450) USR2450 was capable to receive 500kbytes/s and transmit 350kbytes/s tcp traffic for me. since it is not duplex it decreases speed about 30% or teoretical maximum ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Serr" <[email protected]> To: "Linux Access Point Development" <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 6:49 PM Subject: [LinuxAP-dev] USR2450 implimentation > [I was beginning to doubt the viability of my USR2450s, it > seems you > guys are still interested in advancing with them...] > > I am doing WDS and WEP on a 4 node (all USR2450) system. The > performance is pretty bad. I know that both of these kill > performance... Can someone tell me from experience what to expect from > WEP vs non-WEP? Speeds? Also, what are some alternatives to WEP? > IPSec? But can the 2450 do that? > > I'm thinking that maybe I will have the users VPN into a server that is > accessible through the '"'public'"' non-WEP wireless mesh-thing. But it > would be better if I didn't have to throw a full sized computer at the > problem. Also, the public wireless network could be abused or DOSed. > > Right now I have WDS on each of the 4 APs bridging to the other 3 APs. > I might have some weird cascading going on. But I thought WDS was > supposed to find shortest routes for you? > > Any advice? > > Thanks, > -Scott > > PS- I have recently purchased a WRT54G to add to the mix or run beside. > Maybe that can have enough RAM and CPU to do IPSec for the others? > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > LinuxAP-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://linuxAP.ksmith.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxap-dev >