Re: USR2450 implimentation

"Roy" <[email protected]> Mon, 9 Aug 2004 23:57:04 +0300
Newsgroups gmane.linux.drivers.wireless.access-point
Message-ID <001f01c47e53$6cb6ef50$030aa8c0@t>
As I found on inet, wep is quite useless anyway. it takes about 1-3 days to
hack in.

you can use cipe which is supposed to be secure.  and is more or less
implemented in latest flash.
(it is same as ipsec)

I use unsecure network, and performance is still bad, 16mhz(bogomips) cpu is
capable for 350kbytes/s

if you set it to 32mhz it can transfer little more than 400kbytes/s but
requires heatsink on cpu.

this is between same type aps (USR2450)

USR2450 was capable to receive 500kbytes/s
and transmit 350kbytes/s tcp traffic for me.

since it is not duplex it decreases speed about 30% or teoretical maximum










----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Serr" <[email protected]>
To: "Linux Access Point Development" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 6:49 PM
Subject: [LinuxAP-dev] USR2450 implimentation


> [I was beginning to doubt the viability of my USR2450s, it
> seems you
> guys are still interested in advancing with them...]
>
> I am doing WDS and WEP on a 4 node (all USR2450) system.  The
> performance is pretty bad.  I know that both of these kill
> performance...  Can someone tell me from experience what to expect from
> WEP vs non-WEP?  Speeds?  Also, what are some alternatives to WEP?
> IPSec?  But can the 2450 do that?
>
> I'm thinking that maybe I will have the users VPN into a server that is
> accessible through the '"'public'"' non-WEP wireless mesh-thing.  But it
> would be better if I didn't have to throw a full sized computer at the
> problem.  Also, the public wireless network could be abused or DOSed.
>
> Right now I have WDS on each of the 4 APs bridging to the other 3 APs.
> I might have some weird cascading going on.  But I thought WDS was
> supposed to find shortest routes for you?
>
> Any advice?
>
> Thanks,
> -Scott
>
> PS- I have recently purchased a WRT54G to add to the mix or run beside.
> Maybe that can have enough RAM and CPU to do IPSec for the others?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxAP-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linuxAP.ksmith.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxap-dev
>