Re: Samsung4510 Wireless Hacking Session
"Bruno Lopes F. Cabral" <[email protected]> Wed, 22 Oct 2003 20:28:34 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.wireless.access-point |
|---|---|
| Organization | Openline Internet Ltda, http://www.openline.com.br |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello there Henrion Benjamin wrote: > For the DI-614+: > revA = samsung4510 > revB = conexant arm9 > For the DWL900AP+: > revA, B = samsung4510 > revC = conexant arm9 thanks for the clarification!! I won't ever understand why these industry guys modify the hardware and mantain the same model name for their products :~( > I'm 95% sure that we can put linux also on the conexant > arm9 machines because: > > o there's a jtag > o there's already a running uclinux distrib for this which would be... ? > o linux is already running on the same kind of hardware (see actiontec) their source code is a good start but it's far of complete, unfortunately. I mean, the pieces are there, but a lot desorganized for one to follow without more documentation or lots of work also, they still don't have the daughterboards available (this may change in the near future) > > how is the boot-loader thing you ppl were working on? > > For the arm9, I don't know, but I think Peter knows more about... peter ... who? (sorry) > > unfortunately DI-604 doesn't have an easy going console available, > > The 604 is not the same CPU as the conexant arm9 > (http://damin.umlcoop.net/~delink/actiontec-arm.png) it is ADMTEK ADM5106, which is a SoC of conexant CX84200 (ARM7TDI) (the ARM7 part was the reason I asked to you at first place) there is a pic of the board at http://home.comcast.net/~staskh/projects/di_604/ > > and I have no JTAG cable yet (plan to make one or buy the one > > recommended on seattlewireless page). > It's not so complicated to do, but I've missed my first attempt > to do it because I'm not good in soldering... I like this one http://az-electronics.com/item9.htm (US$35 but ready to go). is it "wriggler compatible" too? Cheers !3runo from Brazil