Re: Hacker ethic, brogrammer ethic
Don Marti <[email protected]> Tue, 8 Jul 2014 07:13:16 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.elitists |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
begin Ruben I Safir quotation of Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 08:59:15AM -0400: > > The problem is deeper than this and largely a failure of our own making. > The common public just doesn't get a shit any longer. As long as they > have a steady supply of the dope of choice, then they could care less > about eulas, crowdsourcing, licenses, source code, tracking, stalking, > survalance, social control, etc etc etc. It's never been about the common public, though. Hacker culture is elitist and obnoxious for regular people, too. The differences might just have to do with how you approach... * Network effects * Skilled human labor * Government-granted information monopolies ...and hackers have never been unanimous about how to value them. Brogrammers seem to skew more towards seeking network effects, devaluation of non-bro labor, and use of information monopolies in the service of network effects, though. -- Don Marti http://zgp.org/~dmarti/ [email protected] _______________________________________________ Do not Cc: anyone else on mail sent to this list. The list server is set for maximum one recipient. linux-elitists mailing list [email protected] http://zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists