Matrix seems pretty nice
Teh Entar-Nick <[email protected]> Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:22:45 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.elitists |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This morning I woke up to the following LWN article:
https://lwn.net/Articles/632572/
If you're not a subscriber, you may need to wait a week to read it, but
I encourage everyone to join LWN. It's still worth it.
Basically Matrix is a bit like Usenet in its flood-fill-on-demand model,
but it has a stronger authentication system and signed history. Here
are some interactions with the devs on freenode #matrix, which is
bridged to one of the Matrix chat channels via a gateway that prepends
'M-' to the users on the Matrix side.
11:14 <Spads> So what sort of anti-harrassment facilities does this
matrix thingummer have?
11:15 <M-matthew> basically irc-style atm
11:15 <Spads> how is authority managed for that?
11:16 <M-matthew> similar to a decentralised chanserv
11:16 <M-matthew> room creator gets privs; can delegate that priv
11:17 <M-matthew> whenever you do something privileged over
federation you have to prove your privilege (by
showing why you have permission to do the thing).
11:18 * Spads nods
11:18 <M-matthew> as we (will) have relatively strong identity, we
can also apply rules perserver and peruser to try
to fight spam. but that's not in place yet.
11:19 <Spads> A lot of people are comparing the architecture to
Usenet, and harrassment has become a hot topic in tech
channels lately due to twitter being in the news and
things like Linus's crude tone
11:19 <Spads> I discovered this shortly after posting
http://zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/2015-February/013800.html
so I'm in the market for something New And Better :)
11:19 <Zappelin> Title: [linux-elitists] No results found for
"social justice growth hacking". (at zgp.org)
11:21 <M-matthew> right - usenet has no strong identity obviously,
and no ACL system (beyond archaic moderated
newsgroups)
11:21 * Spads nods
11:21 <M-matthew> and isn't really realtime... and doesn't really do
arbitrary data sync
11:21 <M-matthew> and doesn't have cryptosigned history
11:22 <Spads> so the flood-sync is clever and on-demand, right?
11:22 <M-matthew> yup, basically
11:22 <Spads> like, if a channel has 10 years of history I don't
need to wait for that to catch up to start participating
11:22 <M-matthew> correct
11:22 <Spads> cool
11:22 <Spads> so what about privacy management?
11:23 <M-matthew> you store as little or as much as you like on your
local server, and pull stuff in on demand
11:23 <Spads> which I realise probably overlaps heavily with the
anti-harrassment stuff I asked about
11:23 <M-matthew> with eventual consistency semantics
11:23 <M-matthew> for privacy, you can create anon accounts and use
otr-ish stuff on top (which we will spec rsn)
11:26 <M-matthew> spads: the other difference from usenet is that
it's entirely open federation. and http apis.
11:26 <M-matthew> and hopefully not overrun with pr0n and warez :)
11:27 <M-matthew> but yes, there are slight parallels
11:27 <M-tadzik> well, everyone is free to host their own pron and
warez matrix servers :)
11:27 <M-matthew> but just as much with IMAP or AFS and stuff too
11:27 <M-matthew> tadzik: indeed
11:28 <M-tadzik> can't wait :P
11:28 <M-matthew> hence the joy of open federation
I pointed them in the direction of redecentralize.org and they said that
seems like a good match. So look forward to an interview with them
there some time this year.
_______________________________________________
Do not Cc: anyone else on mail sent to this list. The list server is set for maximum one recipient.
linux-elitists mailing list
[email protected]
http://zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists