Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Rick Moen <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:27:03 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.elitists |
|---|---|
| Organization | If you lived here, you'd be $HOME already. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quoting Greg KH ([email protected]): [unifying, blah blah] You mean documented, stable interfaces as in uselessd, right? ;-> Because, systemd itself has been actually a prime example of churn, and a really dreadful example of stability. > The "fun" thing about the whole Debian mess I always found was that most > of the interfaces, and standards that systemd implemented came directly > from Debian, so in fact, all old-time Debian admins should feel more at > home on Fedora, openSUSE, and everyone else. ISTR that the crisis arose because of a build decision for the gdm3 package, where the Debian developers suddenly decided that the gdm3 package was going to have a Depends declaration requring systemd to ensure that the systemd-logind daemon would be present. And why would systemd-logind need be present just so an X11 display manager could function? Because the GNOME Project, in its great wisdom, had decided that logging in shall require not _just_ logging in but also 'seat' state data to support a weird Freedesktop.org-specific user model -- and Consolekit had heretofore provided that API but, in accordance with the frequent churn of typical Freedesktop.org projects, was now essentially orphaned and deprecated (and ConsoleKit2 might eventually get created but didn't exist yet). Thus, gdm on Debian would start requiring systemd, and because GNOME was/is the standard default DE on Debian, that meant Debian had to start requiring systemd. Everyone got dragged along by the code churn of some GNOME jackasses. Except, of course, the many of us whose reaction was 'Hmm, graduitous dependency drama or no GNOME? Right then, Column B it is.' > If an operating system does not change, it is dead. And that's why everyone loved HAL and devfs, you may remember. ;-> (Good luck getting sysadmins to consider systemd-journald binary logfiles a good idea just because an OS 'needs to change'.) -- Cheers, Atque memento, nulli adsunt Romanorum Rick Moen qui locutionem tuam corrigant. [email protected] McQ! (4x80) _______________________________________________ Do not Cc: anyone else on mail sent to this list. The list server is set for maximum one recipient. linux-elitists mailing list [email protected] http://zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists