Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Don Marti <[email protected]> Mon, 16 May 2016 21:30:23 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.elitists |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20160517043023.GA2009@rosmarinus> |
begin Ruben I Safir quotation of Mon, May 16, 2016 at 05:55:59PM -0400: > Everything systemd does is bad and there is NO WAY that systemd can do what > my custom shell scripts do....exect that it can call my shell scripts. And call them from a flexible set of places. How would you hook up a shell script to PowerTOP without it? http://blog.christophersmart.com/2016/05/08/automatic-power-saving-on-a-linux-laptop-with-powertop-and-systemd/ How would you write a shell script to wake up the system before running? https://joeyh.name/blog/entry/a_programmable_alarm_clock_using_systemd/ > The stated purpose of systemd is make all Linux distros look the same... > that is straight out of Potterings mouth. > > I don't support that effort and neither should you, Why not? Why would I want to reduce the chances that I can help someone with basic administration tasks on a random Linux system? If somebody posts about not being able to ssh in, now I can ask for the output of "systemctl status sshd" even if they're running some distribution I don't know (and I only really know Fedora, Debian, and enough CentOS to install EPEL and pretend it's Fedora.) (Are there fewer and fewer active Linux distributions these days? Active as in they do security updates for base packages in a less-than-scary amount of time?) -- Don Marti <[email protected]> http://zgp.org/~dmarti/ Are you safe from 3rd-party web tracking? http://www.aloodo.org/test/ _______________________________________________ Do not Cc: anyone else on mail sent to this list. The list server is set for maximum one recipient. linux-elitists mailing list [email protected] http://zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists