Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Mon, 23 May 2016 21:19:00 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.elitists |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============1136689129== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-X7eBGw50EcgIGZvqjcMB" --=-X7eBGw50EcgIGZvqjcMB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 02:37 +0200, Tomasz Rola wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 04:18:17PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > >=C2=A0 > > But what's wrong with that?=C2=A0=C2=A0Before you were all running a fo= rk of > > init > > scripts, all hacked up in odd ways that were not compatible across > > any > > distro.=C2=A0=C2=A0What has changed here? > This kind of argument has disputable value. I expect there will > "always" be an OS or flavour of some with "fork of init scripts" and > they will choose to not run systemd or they will choose to give it as > an option. And if Apache folks wanted to run theirs on such OS, they > will have to somehow support such scripts anyway. And so on. So I do > not see systemd as anything close to solving a problem.=C2=A0 The "init scripts are different on different systems" problem may not be solved by systemd (though they will look the same on more systems), but systemd does solve a number of actual problems. For one, it has a reliable way of detecting whether daemons are still running, more so than the old style shell scripts ever could. =C2=A0It relies on cgroups to do this. Secondly, it can use the same cgroups code to set up containers, and make sure the software inside the containers is running. The old shell scripts did not have a way to start things in containers at all. --=20 All Rights Reversed. --=-X7eBGw50EcgIGZvqjcMB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJXQ6wEAAoJEM553pKExN6DVl8H/0zgDUypX5JfO5WI0abuKMYa u+dsW4oJG8BE0gMYAjtKnxtzZ/5EAKw5D/U8zx9LIkCzEYcjumeA62n6ham919tE tgUZA3qq9niA+TiUmI5RMmmyoI1GqZT/a0ute+KcM3ZtTWAJh4mmY/FASdET39fh px5Cc9ltZbrgM+hCxs1HyFYgLMM3jN+HhKZMKren0zxWAWfECGK8QgeOgGz/rqVd zysjpoKzUA5SjPAGQnhz7xFmls8U6tzwhLF2V6ZFUJfGZXedegjKKZ+4c9SYKuG5 KizAMPpuqmgJnqJydg5ePcOsSnGBJkPdI1teNEHunF7YMHIv2lUjmnXp2HAtdbs= =ynjF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-X7eBGw50EcgIGZvqjcMB-- --===============1136689129== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Do not Cc: anyone else on mail sent to this list. The list server is set for maximum one recipient. linux-elitists mailing list [email protected] http://zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists --===============1136689129==--