Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?

Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Tue, 24 May 2016 10:56:04 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.linux.elitists
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--===============1862222211==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-k1HkWYM3gz8KJoiCTKpJ"


--=-k1HkWYM3gz8KJoiCTKpJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 15:24 +0200, Tomasz Rola wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:19:00PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >=C2=A0
> I think there is intetesting pattern among systemd supporters:
>=20
> 1. strong dislike of scripting, in particular shell scripting, as it
> seems
>=20
> 2. fascination with short boot time

I did not mention either of those, nor do I really
care about them.

> > For one, it has a reliable way of detecting whether
> > daemons are still running, more so than the old style
> > shell scripts ever could.=C2=A0=C2=A0It relies on cgroups to
> > do this.
>=20
> Is it so? Better than this:

> Out of curiosity, in what way systemd improves upon
> my script?

Systemd can manage multiple instances of the same
daemon, which is quite common especially when used
in conjunction with containers.

> OTOH, if I can get 80% of functionality with one liner, next 10% with
> 20 lines and the remaining 10% would require that I rebuild the whole
> way I use my system, then this last 10% is probably not worth the
> effort.

Not worth it for you, probably.

However, when a distro has hundreds of thousands,
or even millions of users, there will be significant
number of users who do rely on the last 20% of
functionality.

Their needs are no less legitimate than yours.

> Still, cannot see how systemd would make *my* life so much better
> that
> I would want to abandon whatever I am using right now.

Nobody seems to be telling you to stop abandoning
your scripts.

--=20
All rights reversed

--=-k1HkWYM3gz8KJoiCTKpJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAABAgAGBQJXRGuEAAoJEM553pKExN6D2dkH/0gwTfKNpK6LBFgtNXogS78e
8k3j4lNnawnVUTFLvYmTuXSonjqaDisUt+AJepEqF0dTEZ4MXo230zIkWIIk510d
fsG08hIwSuNwr+QAYZFKRRtyTZwpYUhmqovT5JHLY7FG5yWPKpAMFY7Ch/HnAEWM
WNugqeO2dE/IpsIzQKdb8ZZtTNIPjA3dyeznWRuEUXobnBXi8d3YCuMbaGIeDi5v
pquhE9A8LFSP2JcEpaKEBzbEGs2HkU6lZx/pEnenMDCAbSNBTf9njJEkGQRHs1Dv
rXcYhxApJ39nPIgyeHimK9FCp/aVrC4yP9toWs3d7w/upii1EzKnooMtxLHTmxQ=
=yobP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-k1HkWYM3gz8KJoiCTKpJ--


--===============1862222211==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
Do not Cc: anyone else on mail sent to this list.  The list server is set for maximum one recipient.
linux-elitists mailing list
[email protected]
http://zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists

--===============1862222211==--