Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Tue, 24 May 2016 10:56:04 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.elitists |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============1862222211== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-k1HkWYM3gz8KJoiCTKpJ" --=-k1HkWYM3gz8KJoiCTKpJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 15:24 +0200, Tomasz Rola wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 09:19:00PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: > >=C2=A0 > I think there is intetesting pattern among systemd supporters: >=20 > 1. strong dislike of scripting, in particular shell scripting, as it > seems >=20 > 2. fascination with short boot time I did not mention either of those, nor do I really care about them. > > For one, it has a reliable way of detecting whether > > daemons are still running, more so than the old style > > shell scripts ever could.=C2=A0=C2=A0It relies on cgroups to > > do this. >=20 > Is it so? Better than this: > Out of curiosity, in what way systemd improves upon > my script? Systemd can manage multiple instances of the same daemon, which is quite common especially when used in conjunction with containers. > OTOH, if I can get 80% of functionality with one liner, next 10% with > 20 lines and the remaining 10% would require that I rebuild the whole > way I use my system, then this last 10% is probably not worth the > effort. Not worth it for you, probably. However, when a distro has hundreds of thousands, or even millions of users, there will be significant number of users who do rely on the last 20% of functionality. Their needs are no less legitimate than yours. > Still, cannot see how systemd would make *my* life so much better > that > I would want to abandon whatever I am using right now. Nobody seems to be telling you to stop abandoning your scripts. --=20 All rights reversed --=-k1HkWYM3gz8KJoiCTKpJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAABAgAGBQJXRGuEAAoJEM553pKExN6D2dkH/0gwTfKNpK6LBFgtNXogS78e 8k3j4lNnawnVUTFLvYmTuXSonjqaDisUt+AJepEqF0dTEZ4MXo230zIkWIIk510d fsG08hIwSuNwr+QAYZFKRRtyTZwpYUhmqovT5JHLY7FG5yWPKpAMFY7Ch/HnAEWM WNugqeO2dE/IpsIzQKdb8ZZtTNIPjA3dyeznWRuEUXobnBXi8d3YCuMbaGIeDi5v pquhE9A8LFSP2JcEpaKEBzbEGs2HkU6lZx/pEnenMDCAbSNBTf9njJEkGQRHs1Dv rXcYhxApJ39nPIgyeHimK9FCp/aVrC4yP9toWs3d7w/upii1EzKnooMtxLHTmxQ= =yobP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-k1HkWYM3gz8KJoiCTKpJ-- --===============1862222211== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Do not Cc: anyone else on mail sent to this list. The list server is set for maximum one recipient. linux-elitists mailing list [email protected] http://zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists --===============1862222211==--