Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Ed Carp <[email protected]> Wed, 25 May 2016 00:01:14 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.elitists |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACYmRNBxQ0dy+jGUAz37Qt_FzEmJRm-=LFaGd5tcz_XciQ6wWQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On 5/24/16, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:10:34PM -0700, Ed Carp wrote: >> The problem I have with this entire discussion is that Linux has >> always stood for choice. > > Never been true, sorry: > http://www.islinuxaboutchoice.com/ The problem with this argument is that it's simply not true. For example, if you don't like GNOME, you have a huge number of choices, all doing the same thing in different ways, offering different features. I can switch between window managers easily, and if I use XFCE, it doesn't mean that everyone else either uses XFCE or is some sort of Luddite idiot, and it doesn't mean that there are multiple points of failure, because they're all independent of each other by design But systemd doesn't afford one that choice, and that's my point. Even though systemd was supposedly designed as a "drop-in replacement" for init.d and the like, can it be pulled out and OpenRC or something else be dropped in? Can I switch as easily as I can switch window managers? _______________________________________________ Do not Cc: anyone else on mail sent to this list. The list server is set for maximum one recipient. linux-elitists mailing list [email protected] http://zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists