Re: How about a fork of Jessie without systemd?
Ruben Safir <[email protected]> Wed, 25 May 2016 17:45:55 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.elitists |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:30:52PM +0000, D. Joe wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:37:35PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:10:34PM -0700, Ed Carp wrote: > > > The problem I have with this entire discussion is that Linux has > > > always stood for choice. > > > > Never been true, sorry: > > http://www.islinuxaboutchoice.com/ > > Quite right. Linux is just a kernel. It isn't about choice. This gets counted as a bunch of euphorism tossed about by tech people that don't mean anything when dissect them. Linux is a kernel and the growth of Linux based operating systems has always been about choice, and freedom to chose. You can't just separate the sociological importance of something from its technical merits and properties. This is not to imply that it has been ONLY about choice, but freedom of choice, and PERSONAL CONTROL have been the driving forces of the OS since its inception. To deny that just makes you sound like a mindless hack. It is only relatively recently that big business has run roughshot of the end user/hacker driven opportunity that Linux and Linux culture has represented. And now it is spread. LUGs have driven up and Systemd and Android both represent the same cooperate imperative. Gone are the volumes of useful HOWTOs and FAQs that came with every distro. Now we are facing an increasingly top down hierarchy with no ear to the end user. Imagine this. You guys actually passed off to a bunch of stupid kids that shell scripting is inherently bad, and even unpredictable, and instead shell scripts should be replaced by bright shiny incomprehensible binary that sits in the middle of everything like a cop, telling you what you are allowed and what you are not allowed to do. I'm frankly flabbergasted. The arrogance is beyond belief. And taking advantage of the uninformed with misinformation with the use of FUD is a tactic that is hard to fathom. One can hardly believe that they are actually listening to people from the Linux community. This is a mindset of a group of people who actually believe that it is common for Linux users to be running containers and that is healthy to have multiple instances of daemons running simultaneously (defeating the whole purpose of a daemon). > So glad to see > we're keeping it real, here. > What is REAL. Real is that monday morning you run an update and find that your entire OS has been replaced with a different one. Boy that can really make for a bad week. > *Computing* is fundamentally about choice, though: Read a bit, choose > whether and which bit to write. Repeat...until the entire tapestry of our > increasingly computing-controlled world has been woven. > > The extent to which Linux is about computing, now, that's the tricky > question. > > Maybe it's about joining the effort to sell a fantasy, in which a service or > appliance does exactly and only what we want, when we want it, how we want > it, pay no attention to the Turing machine behind the curtain. (Who "we" > are also left as an exercise for the reader.) > Right a thesis because this is gibberish. The fact that it is a Turing machine, and I'm not certain that is even the case any longer in the classical sense, has nothing to do with individual control of a system. Individual control is a MUST. This is not supposed to be slaveware. Having control of your OS is a bit like having control of your bladder. When you lose control the consequences are rather nasty. > We must also ask ourselves these fundamental and obviously intrinsically > interlinked questions: "Do you ... hate handicap people? Do you hate > people who do not speak English? Do you only care about your own use-case > for GDM?" > I don't work for a cooperate entity and I don't need to ask this at all, not that it has any direct relationship to systemd. > https://youtu.be/ZTdUmlGxVo0?t=1379 > > But I see we've already been drawing from that question pool, so, carry on. > > -- > Joe On ceding power to tech companies: http://xkcd.com/1118/ > man screen | grep -A1 weird > A weird imagination is most useful to gain full advantage of > all the features. > _______________________________________________ > Do not Cc: anyone else on mail sent to this list. The list server is set for maximum one recipient. > linux-elitists mailing list > [email protected] > http://zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists -- So many immigrant groups have swept through our town that Brooklyn, like Atlantis, reaches mythological proportions in the mind of the world - RI Safir 1998 http://www.mrbrklyn.com DRM is THEFT - We are the STAKEHOLDERS - RI Safir 2002 http://www.nylxs.com - Leadership Development in Free Software http://www2.mrbrklyn.com/resources - Unpublished Archive http://www.coinhangout.com - coins! http://www.brooklyn-living.com Being so tracked is for FARM ANIMALS and and extermination camps, but incompatible with living as a free human being. -RI Safir 2013 _______________________________________________ Do not Cc: anyone else on mail sent to this list. The list server is set for maximum one recipient. linux-elitists mailing list [email protected] http://zgp.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists