Re: Re: fr1-2.16 patch for 2.6.10 kernel

"Also sprach Peter T. Breuer:"
> Actually, one can do a little better. Make the whole (2.6.8.1) routine

Nah .. leave the rdev != *rdevp out of it. I don't want to mess up the
count. Leave it to the rest of the existing code to worry about what
happens if we choose the same disk again.

>         for (; i < disks; i++) {
>                 mdk_rdev_t *rdev = conf->mirrors[i].rdev;
>                 if (rdev && rdev != *rdevp && rdev->in_sync) {
>                         *rdevp = rdev;
>                         atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending);
>                         spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
>                         return i;
>                 }
>         }


Peter