Re: Re: fr1-2.16 patch for 2.6.10 kernel

"Also sprach denis bonnenfant:"
> And ******test2 wasn't reached, nor *****break.
> I have a lot of printks outside of this loop, never reached too

Anyway, we get the feeling that the mddev->disks list is fouled up,
possibly with a null entry in the list. All I want is a definitive test
for this condition, so we can start to trace it back to where it
originated. But so far we haven't been able to pin it down :-(.


I'll suggest some separate tests in a little while.

possibly this test:

   list_for_each_entry(rdev,&mddev->disks, same_set) {
       if (!rdev)
           printk owwww....
   }

Peter