Re: Re: fr1-2.16 patch for 2.6.10 kernel

Peter T. Breuer a écrit :
> "Also sprach denis bonnenfant:"
> 
>>It's better. fast resync 5-6 times successivly, but now,
> 
> 
> OK.
> 
> 
>>sda1 (read) [events: 000000e6]
>>md: *** lecture uuid  800001
>>md: old uuid 5dc1267b 788f7499 cd49d3c0 d06f0b96
>>md: new uuid 5dc1267b 788f7499 cd49d3c0 d06f0b96
>>md0: new disk 800001 too old for repair (disk 230 < bitmap 232)  <****** 
>>still a problem ?
> 
> 
> That's a difficult one.  The problem is that I don't exactly know the
> algorithm that is used to stamp the event counter on the disk
> superblocks and on the array superblock.  I assume that removing a
> device or setting it faulty is an "event" that increments the array
> superblock event counter, but obviously can't affect the faulted or
> removed disk.  So I am willing to assume that a returning disk is OK if
> its counter is "one-behind" the value shown on the bitmap as being the
> array event count when the bitmap was started.
> 
> But two behind? 

I have mounted /dev/md0 after the fail. Maybe the second event ?
I check this.