Re: Please name new maintainers
Ross Boylan <[email protected]> Tue, 04 Dec 2007 23:33:16 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.evms.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 22:25 -0600, John Lange wrote: > On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 08:00 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > > You know you can simply turn the volumes into non-EVMS ones and use plain > > LVM tools instead? > > According to a recent posting here that is very difficult to accomplish. The fact that I had problems is not necessarily a sign that others, particularly those who really know what they're doing, will have problems. It would be great if those who know would share, here :) The other point, which you seem to have run into, is that not everyone will be able to convert to compatibility volumes or fall back on other tools, depending upon which evms features they are using. I think the manual says that only volumes that aren't using EVMS "feature objects" can be converted to compatibiity volumes. Since evms is mostly using other facilities, it seems possible in principle to do without it. It certainly would be wonderful if active maintainership resumed. Ross Boylan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Evms-devel mailing list [email protected] To subscribe/unsubscribe, please visit: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/evms-devel