Re: Réf. : Re: alas for thee, ?EVMS
Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:39:12 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.evms.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2008-12-01T12:13:21, Jeremy Jackson <[email protected]> wrote: > What type of locking do LVM2 utils use? Does in-kernel device-mapper > provide locking? No; device-mapper doesn't provide locking. C-LVM2 syncs via user-space and openAIS. > In pondering what EVMS3 architecture would look like, it occurrs to me > that the mismatch between LVM2 and EVMS's use of device-mapper is > currently a major impediment to EVMS maintenance... being more like LVM2 > (or LVM2 being more like EVMS) would give more users/maintainers. I don't think the mismatch is at the dm-* level. Both in fact use the same dm-* kernel components. Regards, Lars -- = Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N=FCrnberg) "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great priz= es Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=3D100&url=3D/ _______________________________________________ Evms-devel mailing list [email protected] To subscribe/unsubscribe, please visit: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/evms-devel