Re: Réf. : Re: alas for thee, ?EVMS

Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Dec 2008 15:39:12 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.evms.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2008-12-01T12:13:21, Jeremy Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:

> What type of locking do LVM2 utils use?  Does in-kernel device-mapper
> provide locking?

No; device-mapper doesn't provide locking. C-LVM2 syncs via user-space
and openAIS.

> In pondering what EVMS3 architecture would look like, it occurrs to me
> that the mismatch between LVM2 and EVMS's use of device-mapper is
> currently a major impediment to EVMS maintenance... being more like LVM2
> (or LVM2 being more like EVMS) would give more users/maintainers.

I don't think the mismatch is at the dm-* level. Both in fact use the
same dm-* kernel components.


Regards,
    Lars

-- =

Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N=FCrnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great priz=
es
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=3D100&url=3D/
_______________________________________________
Evms-devel mailing list
[email protected]
To subscribe/unsubscribe, please visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/evms-devel