Re: problems getting started

Things are getting weirder.

show node A returns 'Machine (A) is not defined.'

BUT

define node A fails with 'Machine (A) exists.'

Is there some good documentation somewhere on how to get started and create a trivial setup ?

I'm also having trouble with fstask 1.0.3. Some commands work while others just seem to never respond. I tried compiling FailSafe-mgr 1.0.4 from cvs, but it hangs forever when it gets to the first javac statement. (using IBM's 118) If i use IBM Java2 1.3 the compile fails.

I do have a copy of fstask from 1.0.3 which will run with Java2 1.3 but not with Java 1.1.8 !

To top it off my log files are filling up with :

==> cmond_log <==
Sun Jun 16 16:02:36.208 <cmond 18790:1024> <cmond_proc.c:178> Starting process crsd.
Sun Jun 16 16:02:36.208 <cmond 18790:1024> <cmond_proc.c:97> Going to fork/exec new process "crsd -l ".
Sun Jun 16 16:02:36.209 <cmond 18790:1024> <cmond_proc.c:140> New process crsd pid 19376
Sun Jun 16 16:02:36.209 <cmond 18790:1024> <cmond_pg.c:767> Recovery for process group cluster_control complete.
Sun Jun 16 16:02:36.545 <cmond 18790:1024> <cmond_sig.c:270> Process with pid 19376 has exited with status 11
Sun Jun 16 16:02:36.545 <cmond 18790:1024> <cmond_sig.c:274> 1 processes have exited.
Sun Jun 16 16:02:36.545 <cmond 18790:1024> <cmond_pg.c:687> Process crsd:19376 of group cluster_control exited, status = 0, received signal 11.
Sun Jun 16 16:02:36.545 <cmond 18790:1024> <cmond_pg.c:701> Initiating recovery for process group cluster_control.


I'm on the verge of giving up. Is it meant to be this difficult ?!

<<< "Scott Fagg" <[email protected]>  6/16  2:53p >>>
I think the problem occured because portmap didn't start after the reboot.

Now that i've got portmap running, the error doesn't occur. Is that the mechanism by which parts of FS get at the configuration information ? I'm guessing there's a daemon running that all components talk to to get config info, and that RPC is used to communicate with the daemon ?

<<< Lars Marowsky-Bree <[email protected]>  6/15 10:35p >>>
On 2002-06-15T19:52:32,
   Scott Fagg <[email protected]> said:

> Sat Jun 15 19:23:43.871 <E anonymous log 3801:0 ci_log_cdb.c:207> CI_CONFERR_NOTFOUND, Logging configuration error: could not read cluster database /var/lib/failsafe/cdb/cdb.db, cdb error = 3.
> Could not open database /var/lib/failsafe/cdb/cdb.db
> 
> 
> ... and /var/log/messages contains this :
> 
> Could not open configuration database.
> 
> Any thoughts ?

No. Not enough data(tm); what does cdbd_log say on the two nodes?


Sincerely,
    Lars Marowsky-Brée <[email protected]>

-- 
Immortality is an adequate definition of high availability for me.
	--- Gregory F. Pfister


                        
_______________________________________________
LinuxFailSafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.community.tummy.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxfailsafe