database inconsistent after restart
"Martin Bene" <[email protected]> Thu, 1 Aug 2002 18:10:31 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.failsafe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, I'm seeing quite a strange effects with my (1.04) failsafe cluster after a complete shutdown (UPS failure). Startup of both systems, cdbd on 2nd node started to receive database update(s), but never finished: Thu Aug 1 13:39:34.653 webc2 cdbd - Checking quorum with 2 members for any unknown members. Thu Aug 1 13:39:34.653 webc2 cdbd - All quorum member machines are known to us. Thu Aug 1 13:39:34.653 webc2 cdbd - Starting to receive CDB sync series from machine 1 Thu Aug 1 13:56:05.849 webc2 cdbd - terminating on signal 15 (pid 1436) (I gave up after 15 minutes, and shut down node webc2). I started the cluster using just node1, started failsafe services on node1 and now have all services running on node1. Now, startup node2: Thu Aug 1 17:44:18.628 webc2 cdbd - Local CDB obsolete for new quorum: cluster id: 0x00000000.0x3cd80f3a274e58f0, master: 1, sequence: 57, member count: 2, members: 2, 1 Thu Aug 1 17:44:47.178 webc2 cdbd - Finished receiving CDB sync series from machine 1 Thu Aug 1 17:44:47.178 webc2 cdbd - Starting to receive CDB sync series from machine 1 Thu Aug 1 17:44:47.186 webc2 cdbd - Finished receiving CDB sync series from machine 1 Thu Aug 1 17:44:47.186 webc2 cdbd - Checking quorum with 2 members for any unknown members. Thu Aug 1 17:44:47.186 webc2 cdbd - All quorum member machines are known to us. Thu Aug 1 17:44:47.229 webc2 cdbd - New quorum: cluster id: 0x00000000.0x3cd80f3a274e58f0, master: 1, sequence: 57, member count: 2, members: 2, 1 Thu Aug 1 17:44:47.229 webc2 cdbd - New quorum: cluster id: 0x00000000.0x3cd80f3a274e58f0, master: 1, sequence: 57, member count: 2, members: 2, 1 Thu Aug 1 17:44:47.233 webc2 cdbd - CDB on node webc2 (2) marked current in fs2proc_machine_register_1 As you see, node2 told me that db db replication finished OK; node2 should now have an identical view of what's going on in the cluster as node1 has, shouldn't it? Fact is: it doesn't. when running the gui connected to node1, I see the cluster in status "Normal", Node1 as "UP", Node2 as "inactive" and both resource groups running & online on node1. connecting the gui to node2 I see node1 as "unknown", node2 as "inactive" and both resource groups in "online ready" status. Node2 as inactive is correct - I haven't started ha services on that node yet, but I'm not at all sure that actually doing so would be a good idea given the mismatched status information I get from the two nodes. Any Idea what's going wrong here? Thanks, Martin