Re: LinuxFailSafe digest, Vol 1 #418 - 5 msgs
Sankaran Parasaram <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.failsafe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello All, I am interested in contributing to Linux Failsafe project. How do I proceed ? Are there any qualification requirements to contribute to this project ? Thanks, PVS --- [email protected] wrote: > Send LinuxFailSafe mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, > visit > > http://lists.community.tummy.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxfailsafe > or, via email, send a message with subject or body > 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it > is more specific > than "Re: Contents of LinuxFailSafe digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Question about failsafe CVS (Kashif Shaikh) > 2. Re: How does failsafe use fam? (Padmanabhan > Sreenivasan) > 3. Re: Constant core dumps... (Kashif Shaikh) > 4. Re: Question about failsafe CVS (Scott Henry) > 5. Re: Question about failsafe CVS (Oliver Jehle) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 14:19:24 -0400 > From: Kashif Shaikh <[email protected]> > To: Linux FailSafe <[email protected]> > Subject: [LinuxFailSafe] Question about failsafe CVS > > Hello, > > Well, the oss.sgi.com cvs is back up. However I > am still unsure where > to grab the latest CVS version of failsafe. I know > I asked this > question before, but I'm still confused about this > tidbit. > > You see, on suse's ftp site, they have failsafe > version 1.0.3(and the > VERSION file confirms this), yet when I use cvs to > checkout > oss.sgi.com's failsafe or projects/failsafe the > VERSION file specifies, > "1.0.1". > > Now if you goto sgi's oss ftp site, you can get an > updated failsafe; > but that version is 1.0.2. Unless there is an > internal CVS used by Suse > for FailSafe(where then you can only get RPMs off > the suse ftp site), > can someone please enlighten me as to the correct > place to get > lastest/updated CVS files for linux failsafe? > > Thanks in advance, > > Kashif > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 11:54:36 -0700 > From: Padmanabhan Sreenivasan <[email protected]> > Organization: SGI > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [LinuxFailSafe] How does failsafe use > fam? > > [email protected] wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I wanted to understand how fam is used by failsafe > so I had a look at the > > CVS and did a find+grep for "fam.h". This gave no > result whatsoever. Mabye > > the dependency on fam is only a "technical" one in > the sense that one of > > the `sysadm*' packages needs it, but it is not > used by failsafe? Or does > > failsafe use it indirectly via `sysadm*'? > > FailSafe does not use fam. It is a dependency > because sysadm* > packages need it. > > Paddy > > > > > > > Regards, > > Frank > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LinuxFailSafe mailing list > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.community.tummy.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxfailsafe > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 17:35:23 -0400 > From: Kashif Shaikh <[email protected]> > To: Oliver Jehle <[email protected]> > CC: Linux FailSafe <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [LinuxFailSafe] Constant core dumps... > > Thanks Oliver! Those patches removed 'infinite core > dumps'! > > However before I attempted to use your patches, I > attempted to install > Linux FailSafe(using the Suse rpms) on my Redhat 7.2 > system at home. > And you know what? It worked for some strange > reason. For the Redhat > 7.2(out of the box redhat with kernel upgraded to > 2.4.9-31) I had: > > Glibc: 2.2.4-19.3 > Libstdc++: 2.96.98 > Gcc: 2.96-98 > > So then I figured I should probably update these > core libraries and gcc > on my work computer with RH7.1. Alas, that didn't > work either. > So then I tried your patches against the > linuxfailsafe 1.0.3 Suse src > rpms, and *it worked*! No more coredumps. > > So far I've defined the nodes, clusters, NFS > resource types, and > resource groups with no problems encountered. I can > go ahead now > and write some custom plugins for resources I > need(md0 support). > > Thanks again, > > Kashif Shaikh > > > Oliver Jehle wrote: > > >Hi Kashif > > > >the problem is known... and i've a bugfix for it... > i hope they will be > >included in the main-cvs when its finished (the > patches > >are sent to the maintainers to check them and > review). > >i attach you my patches to test them and to have a > running system > > > >you have to apply the patches as follows > > > >cd srctree/FailSafe/cluster_admin/cmd/cdbd/inc > >patch <fs2d.diff > >cd ../src > >patch <attach.diff > >patch <process.diff > > > >and build / install failsafe new... > > > >the patches are against the last cvs-snapshot i > have.. but i think, it should > >work also with the sources from suse. > > > >nice weekend > > > >oliver > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 4 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [LinuxFailSafe] Question about failsafe > CVS > Organization: SSO Engineering, Silicon Graphics, > Inc. > From: Scott Henry <[email protected]> > Date: 08 Apr 2002 16:25:08 -0700 > > >>>>> "K" == Kashif Shaikh <[email protected]> > writes: > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax http://taxes.yahoo.com/