Re: 2 node cluster
Kashif Shaikh <[email protected]> 15 May 2003 16:17:46 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.failsafe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1053029869.7118.14.camel@kashif> |
heartbeat can be configured active-active, no? On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 14:59, Dan Goscomb wrote: > however, i need, as explained, both machines active at the same time... > active-active... not active-standby >=20 >=20 > On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 20:10, Kashif Shaikh wrote: > > Have you checked out www.linux-ha.org? > >=20 > > If you just want to have the IP as 'highly available', then I suggest > > you check out heartbeat(available on the linux-ha website). > >=20 > > If one machine fails, another machine would take over the IP address. > >=20 > > Kashif > >=20 > >=20 > > On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 14:11, Dan Goscomb wrote: > > > i do not want to use any load directors... believe me i've looked at > > > everything and i would prefer an app switch, but cost is a major issu= e > > > here. i have 2 machines to work with, and that is it. > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 19:09, an unknown sender wrote: > > > > Em Quinta 15 Maio 2003 13:53, Dan Goscomb escreveu: > > > >=20 > > > > Maybe what you're looking for is ldirectord, it's more reliable tha= n round=20 > > > > robin DNS and far easier to set up than failsafe: > > > >=20 > > > > http://www.vergenet.net/linux/ldirectord/ > > > >=20 > > > > rgrds, > > > > Br=E1ulio Gergull > > > > GetNet Comunica=E7=F5es Ltda. > > > > http://www.getnet.com.br/ > > > > http://www.suse-brasil.com.br/ > > > >=20 > > > > > thats what i thought i had explained i wanted! > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 17:42, Michael Gesundheit wrote: > > > > > > Why should you use ip aliasing?? > > > > > > You can have the survived server alias the dead server IP until= it > > > > > > will be fixed or whatever. > > > > > > > > > > > > -Michael > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan Goscomb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to configure a 2 node cluster where each m= achine > > > > > > has a > > > > > > unique IP address and both are accessible at the same t= ime > > > > > > (via round > > > > > > robin DNS). > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like it so that if one machine went down the ot= her > > > > > > would take > > > > > > over its IP address... this, i would imagine, would inv= olve 2 > > > > > > clusters... one with machine 1 as the primary and machi= ne 2 > > > > > > secondary, > > > > > > and one with machine 2 as the primary and machine 1 sec= ondary. > > > > > > > > > > > > Is this possible and if so could someone send me an exa= mple > > > > > > config? > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > Dan. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Dan Goscomb > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > LinuxFailSafe mailing list > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > http://lists.community.tummy.com/mailman/listinfo/linux= failsafe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > -Michael > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________________= _______ > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > > > > > The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. > > > --=20 > > > Dan Goscomb <[email protected]> > > >=20 > > > _______________________________________________ > > > LinuxFailSafe mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://lists.community.tummy.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxfailsafe > >=20 > --=20 > Dan Goscomb <[email protected]> >=20 > _______________________________________________ > LinuxFailSafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.community.tummy.com/mailman/listinfo/linuxfailsafe