Re: [PATCH 01/16] [FB] viafb: Fix various resource leaks during module_init()
Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]> Fri, 9 Apr 2010 13:31:39 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.fbdev.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | LWN.net |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:22:57 +0200 Florian Tobias Schandinat <[email protected]> wrote: > > if (!viafbinfo->screen_base) { > > printk(KERN_INFO "ioremap failed\n"); > > - return -ENOMEM; > > + rc = -EIO; > > I don't know whether this is right (changing the return code) as Andrew > recommend a while ago: > "It should return -ENOMEM rather than -1, but that's minor." > So I did and now I wonder which one is correct? To me it seems like -ENOMEM could be a bit confusing here; there's a lot of things that could go wrong with that same error return. That said, I did some digging around, and -ENOMEM does seem to be the standard response to an ioremap() failure. So I've changed it back. > > if (!viafbinfo1) { > > printk(KERN_ERR > > "allocate the second framebuffer struct error\n"); > > - framebuffer_release(viafbinfo); > > - return -ENOMEM; > > rc = -ENOMEM; > is missing? Indeed. Fixed. Thanks, jon