Re: Re: Total radeonfb failure on both 2.6.0-test4 and 2.6.0-test4-mm4

Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.fbdev.user,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >   It appears that the 2.6 driver is essentially the old one, without Ben's
> > patch (which fixed framebuffer for me on 2.4). Is there a version of this
> > updated driver for 2.6 as well? Is there any reason why it is not integrated
> > yet?
> 
> I'm working on a new driver for 2.6 that include my 2.4 updates, a
> slightly reworked version of Kronos and Jon i2c DDC code and some
> more source cleanup (split the driver in separate files actually).
> 
> It's not finished yet though. I'm not yet sure I'll add support for
> dual head in the first version neither, all of this pretty much depends
> on how much time I'll be able to dedicate to it during the upcoming
> week.

What about `release early, release often', and add the dual-head support after
your first release? ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.