Re: Framebuffer devices as modules?
"Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:06:53 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.fbdev.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 06:05:34AM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: >> Florian Echtler wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Hi, I was trying to have fbcon and nvidiafb as modules, however, >>> the console stays plain VGA when I load both. fbset complains >>> about "no such device: /dev/fb0".. (the device itself exists, and >>> works when everything is compiled into the kernel). >> What kernel version are you using? > > BTW, would it be possible to use the new initramfs infrastructure, to move the > fbdev drivers out of the kernel and into their own initramfs thingy, and still > be able to start them as early as possible ? I don't see why not. You can compile fbcon statically, and the drivers as modules. Or both fbcon and drivers as modules. Tony ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf