Re: Linux-fbdev-users Digest, Vol 1, Issue 332

"Antonino A. Daplas" <[email protected]> Fri, 30 Jun 2006 04:41:46 +0800
Newsgroups gmane.linux.fbdev.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Nathan King wrote:
> Hi James,
> 
> I can mmap it, but I found that using file operations to access it was
> about 2-3 times faster than accessing it through a mmap'ed buffer. Is
> it possible I'm doing that wrong? Here's my stuff for that:
> 

Using the file accessors are actually more portable than using mmap. And
if it's faster, then that's better.

> fbfd = open("/dev/fb0", O_RDONLY);
> fbp = (unsigned char *)mmap(0, screensize, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fbfd, 0);
> 
> Then I read from fbp with memcpy and memcmp. If I'm going against some
> long upheld programming convention feel free to throw things at me.

Looks okay. Reading from video RAM on PCI cards will always be slower than
writes.

> 
> Thanks,
> Nathan
> 
> 
>> On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 18:08 -0600, Nathan King wrote:
>>> What's the preferred way to read a block of pixels from the screen?
>>> I'm developing something like a remote desktop app, and I haven't
>>> found a whole lot of documentation on this. Right now I'm opening
>>> the /dev/fb0 device and accessing it by means of lseek/read, file
>>> descriptor style. This seems reasonably fast but I feel there must be
>>> a better way.

Your only choices for the standard kernel are mmap and read/write. But
if you can use an acceleration library (DirectFB www.directfb.org), that
would be the best.

Tony

Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642