Re: NFS ACL strangeness

On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 11:02:02AM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > Restictive umask (0066) by default and a less restrictive one (0022) on
> > some specific directories?
> 
> No. The umask is always applied.

OK, I tried the other way round:

--cut--
sven@diesel:~> umask
0022
sven@diesel:~> getfacl .
# file: .
# owner: sven
# group: sven
user::rwx
group::--x
other::--x
default:user::rwx
default:group::---
default:other::---

sven@diesel:~> touch foo
sven@diesel:~> ls -l foo
-rw-r--r--  1 sven sven 0 2004-11-19 19:59 foo
--cut--

Looks like this won't work as well :(

Sven

-- 
"Thinking of using NT for your critical apps?
                                  Isn't there enough suffering in the world?"
                   (Advertisement of Sun Microsystems in Wall Street Journal)
/me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web

_______________________________________________
acl-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://acl.bestbits.at/mailman/listinfo/acl-devel