Re: Behaviour of 'file group' acl entries
Kevin Shanahan <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:33:58 +0930
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.file-systems.acl.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | UnitingCare Wesley Bowden Inc. |
| Message-ID | <1145502238.4007.49.camel@localhost> |
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 10:35 +0930, Kevin Shanahan wrote: > Yes, it makes sense when you put it like that. I was trying to test > Samba's behaviour with the 'acl group control' option when the file > group had no write access. It looks like it's not possible to have the > file group with less access than any ACL_USER or ACL_GROUP entries. > Thanks for the clarification. Just following up to myself here in case somebody comes back and reads this and gets the wrong idea. I see now (after actual testing) that of course it is possible for the ACL_GROUP_OBJ entry to have r-x permissions while another ACL_GROUP or ACL_USER entry gets rxw (with ACL_MASK of rxw). Even though the S_IRWXG bit is showing as set (due to the mask), the file group's access is still limited to what is specified in the ACL_GROUP_OBJ entry. Cheers, Kevin. _______________________________________________ acl-devel mailing list [email protected] http://acl.bestbits.at/mailman/listinfo/acl-devel