Re: Re: CIFS-VFS error

Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.file-systems.cifs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:37:59 -0500
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Jeff Layton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:28:44 -0400
> > Anirudh Srinivasan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Ok can you please tell me upgrading to what version of kernel will fix this
> >> issue.
> >
> > No, because we don't know what the problem actually is. The problem
> > could be that the server just plain isn't responding, or it could mean
> > that there's a problem processing those replies. There are fixes for
> > several problems of the latter variety that have gone into RHEL over
> > the last 2 years.
> >
> > --
> > Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-cifs-client mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client
> >
> 
> Jeff,
> 
> How about a kernel that brings in 1.56 version of cifs?
> I think that version of cifs has the socket error fixes (i.e. change
> from non-blocking
> to blocking), these errors in syslog are the same errors with
> non-blocking sockets.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Shirish

In general, the later the better. 5.3-ish kernels should have most of
what you want. If you have someplace non-critical to do so, you're also
free to test the kernels on my people.redhat.com page and see if they
improve things for you:

http://people.redhat.com/jlayton

..the code in the RHEL5 kernels there is pretty close to what's slated
for inclusion in 5.4.

-- 
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.