Re: Getting CIFS ACLs larger than CIFSMaxBufSize

Hi Shirish,

Thanks for the reply.

Is this not the problem with any trans2 command? According to the protocol,
if the server has more data than MaxDataCount, it replies with error
BUFFER_TOO_SMALL,
I could not find the code to handle this error in cifs client.
Are we assuming that the response size for any request from cifs server will
fall below CIFSMaxBufSize?

This is actually my doubt while understanding the code, I do not have the
traces yet.

Thanks
Sreekanth

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Shirish Pargaonkar <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Sreekanth G <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I am trying to figure out how does linux cifs client handles the
> situation
> > when the server has data for security descriptor larger than the
> > CIFSMaxBufSize.
> > In this case, the remaining data is lost?
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Sreekanth
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-cifs-client mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client
> >
> >
>
> Sreekanth,
>
> The acl code in cifs is still has some/long way to go.  There are lot
> more things that need to be implemented
> and added, that is why it is still experimental.  Are you running into
> this problem, that the size of the
> response data to query security descriptor execeeds maxbuffersize limit?
> Can you send the wireshark trace of this transaction if you can?
>

_______________________________________________
linux-cifs-client mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client