Re: linux-next: cifs tree build failure

Steve French <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.file-systems.cifs,gmane.linux.kernel.next,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Jeff,
I just applied and reviewed your patch 5 (thus modified your patch
slightly before merging).

https://mail.google.com/mail/?shva=1#search/cifs_show_address/121cfb7757cb8e86

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Jeff Layton<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:32:22 +1000
> Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: In function 'cifs_show_options':
>> fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:357: error: implicit declaration of function 'cifs_show_address'
>>
>> Caused by commit 8616e0fc1e27295316f9821a883f0e9fa6f8200f ("cifs: remove
>> unneeded NULL checks from cifs_show_options").
>>
>> I have used the cifs tree from next-20090612 for today.
>
> My fault. That function gets introduced in a later patch and I had a
> bogus call left in here from when I reorganized the series. This
> patch should fix it and a typo that got silently fixed in a patch that
> hasn't been committed yet.
>
> This patch should fix both. Steve F., let me know if you want me to
> respin the series on top of this patch. Note that there's still a
> harmless compiler warning that gets fixed in a later patch in the
> series.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
>



-- 
Thanks,

Steve
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.