Re: test status
Steve French <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.file-systems.cifs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Haven't had time to try yet, trying now On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Jeff Layton<[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:52 -0500, Steve French wrote: >> Two test runs using "dbench -D /mnt/dbench-test-dir 60" (in this case >> the older dbench 3.04) : >> One against Samba 3.0.28a had the usual errors in the cleanup phase >> (which are hard to avoid due to their broken posix open support but we >> need to look into more) >> The test run against more current Samba server >> (3.4.0-GIT-b660e51-devel) failed though: >> >> 60 1834 1.79 MB/sec execute 304 sec >> 60 1837 1.79 MB/sec execute 305 sec >> 60 1840 1.78 MB/sec execute 306 sec >> 60 1843 1.77 MB/sec execute 307 sec >> 60 1846 1.77 MB/sec execute 308 sec >> (1861) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client27/~dmtmp/PARADOX/STUDENTS.DB >> failed for handle 10277 (Too many open files) >> (1877) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client51/~dmtmp/PARADOX/__43904.DB >> failed for handle 10283 (Too many open files) >> (1878) ERROR: handle 10283 was not found >> (1834) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client59/~dmtmp/PARADOX/COURSES.VAL >> failed for handle 10269 (Too many open files) >> (1835) ERROR: handle 10269 was not found >> (1861) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client40/~dmtmp/PARADOX/STUDENTS.DB >> failed for handle 10277 (Too many open files) >> (1808) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client58/~dmtmp/PARADOX/__42B96.DB >> failed for handle 10262 (Too many open files) >> (1809) ERROR: handle 10262 was not found >> (1954) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client29/~dmtmp/PARADOX/__43212.DB >> failed for handle 10288 (Too many open files) >> (1955) ERROR: handle 10288 was not found >> (1868) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client5/~dmtmp/PARADOX/__43904.DB >> failed for handle 10281 (Too many open files) >> 60 1850 1.76 MB/sec execute 309 sec >> Child failed with status 1 >> >> >> Can anyone else reproduce this with Jeff's inode patch series? > > Strange... > > Is this reproducible without that patchset in place? > > -- > Jeff Layton <[email protected]> > > -- Thanks, Steve