Re: test status

On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 12:29 -0500, Steve French wrote:
> Haven't had time to try yet, trying now
> 
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Jeff Layton<[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 11:52 -0500, Steve French wrote:
> >> Two test runs using "dbench -D /mnt/dbench-test-dir 60" (in this case
> >> the older dbench 3.04) :
> >> One against Samba 3.0.28a had the usual errors in the cleanup phase
> >> (which are hard to avoid due to their broken posix open support but we
> >> need to look into more)
> >> The test run against more current Samba server
> >> (3.4.0-GIT-b660e51-devel) failed though:
> >>
> >>   60      1834     1.79 MB/sec  execute 304 sec
> >>   60      1837     1.79 MB/sec  execute 305 sec
> >>   60      1840     1.78 MB/sec  execute 306 sec
> >>   60      1843     1.77 MB/sec  execute 307 sec
> >>   60      1846     1.77 MB/sec  execute 308 sec
> >> (1861) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client27/~dmtmp/PARADOX/STUDENTS.DB
> >> failed for handle 10277 (Too many open files)
> >> (1877) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client51/~dmtmp/PARADOX/__43904.DB
> >> failed for handle 10283 (Too many open files)
> >> (1878) ERROR: handle 10283 was not found
> >> (1834) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client59/~dmtmp/PARADOX/COURSES.VAL
> >> failed for handle 10269 (Too many open files)
> >> (1835) ERROR: handle 10269 was not found
> >> (1861) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client40/~dmtmp/PARADOX/STUDENTS.DB
> >> failed for handle 10277 (Too many open files)
> >> (1808) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client58/~dmtmp/PARADOX/__42B96.DB
> >> failed for handle 10262 (Too many open files)
> >> (1809) ERROR: handle 10262 was not found
> >> (1954) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client29/~dmtmp/PARADOX/__43212.DB
> >> failed for handle 10288 (Too many open files)
> >> (1955) ERROR: handle 10288 was not found
> >> (1868) open /mnt1/dbench-test-dir/clients/client5/~dmtmp/PARADOX/__43904.DB
> >> failed for handle 10281 (Too many open files)
> >>   60      1850     1.76 MB/sec  execute 309 sec
> >> Child failed with status 1
> >>
> >>
> >> Can anyone else reproduce this with Jeff's inode patch series?
> >
> > Strange...
> >
> > Is this reproducible without that patchset in place?
> >
> > --
> > Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 

I wonder whether the server recorded any errors during this period? 

Looks like we translate ERRnofids from the server as EMFILE.

-- 
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>