Re: [patch] doc changes - add options and description of the options in umount.cifs doc

Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.file-systems.cifs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 14:51 -0500, Shirish Pargaonkar wrote:
> diff --git a/docs-xml/manpages-3/umount.cifs.8.xml
> b/docs-xml/manpages-3/umount.cifs.8.xml
> index 38ce242..388933e 100644
> --- a/docs-xml/manpages-3/umount.cifs.8.xml
> +++ b/docs-xml/manpages-3/umount.cifs.8.xml
> @@ -54,14 +54,52 @@ can rely on specifying explicit entries
> in /etc/fstab See</para>
>  <refsect1>
>         <title>OPTIONS</title>
>         <variablelist>
> -        <varlistentry>
> -                <term>--verbose</term>
> -                <listitem><para>print additional debugging
> information</para></listitem>
> -        </varlistentry>
> -        <varlistentry>
> -                <term>--no-mtab</term>
> -                <listitem><para>Do not update the mtab even if
> unmount completes successfully (/proc/mounts will still display the
> correct information)</para></listitem>
> -        </varlistentry>
> +               <varlistentry>
> +                <term>-V</term>
> +                <listitem><para>Print version and
> exit.</para></listitem>
> +               </varlistentry>
> +               <varlistentry>
> +                <term>-h</term>
> +                <listitem><para>Print help message and
> exit.</para></listitem>
> +               </varlistentry>
> +               <varlistentry>
> +                <term>-n</term>
> +                <listitem><para>Unmount without changing /etc/mtab.
> +                               </para></listitem>
> +               </varlistentry>

I may have mentioned this before, but shouldn't the "-n" option here
just be a synonym of the --no-mtab option? So the manpage should read
something like:

-n|--no-mtab
	Do not update the mtab even if unmount completes successfully
	(/proc/mounts will still display the correct information)


...that seems to be the standard way to handle synonyms like this in
manpages. I think the smbd manpage has some options like this
("--debuglevel" for instance).

> +               <varlistentry>
> +                <term>-r</term>
> +                <listitem><para>In case unmounting fails, try to
> remount
> +                               read-only.</para></listitem>
> +               </varlistentry>
> +               <varlistentry>
> +                <term>-f</term>
> +                <listitem><para>Force unmount (in case of an
> unreachable
> +                               server).</para></listitem>
> +               </varlistentry>
> +               <varlistentry>
> +                <term>-l</term>
> +                <listitem><para>Lazy unmount. Detach the filesystem
> from
> +                               the filesysetm hierarchy now, and
> +                               cleanup all references to the
> filesystem
> +                               as soon as it is not busy
> anymore.</para></listitem>
> +               </varlistentry>
> +               <varlistentry>
> +                <term>-e</term>
> +                <listitem><para>Mark the mount point as expired.  If
> a mount
> +                               point is not currently in use, then an
> initial
> +                               call to unmount with this flag fails
> with the
> +                               error EAGAIN, but marks the mount
> point as
> +                               expired.  The mount point remains
> expired as
> +                               long as it isn't accessed by any
> process.
> +                               A second unmount call specifying -e
> unmounts
> +                               an expired mount point.  This flag
> cannot be
> +                               specified with either -f or
> -l</para></listitem>
> +               </varlistentry>
> +               <varlistentry>
> +                <term>-v</term>
> +                <listitem><para>Verbose mode.</para></listitem>
> +               </varlistentry>
>  
>         </variablelist>
>  </refsect1>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.