Re: [PATCH] mount.cifs: properly check for mount being in fstab when running setuid root (try#3)
Shirish Pargaonkar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.file-systems.cifs,gmane.network.samba.internals |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Jeff Layton<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 11:42 -0500, Shirish Pargaonkar wrote: >> Jeff, >> >> late comments... but as mentioned in Samba bugzilla bug 5118, it is >> confusing to use >> user (to allow user mounts) and user=<username> mount options in an >> entry in /etc/fstab. >> I do not see any other way but to allow/continue using them as they are. >> They are handled correctly, just that the same mount option getting >> used twice for >> different purposes can be confusing! > > Agreed. The decision to use "user=" for specifying the username was not > a good one. I think smbfs used "username=", and I believe it was for > that reason. > > Unfortunately, we're sort of stuck with it for the time being. We could > start transitioning away from it but we'll need to come up with a > replacement option name (maybe username=) and set it up as an alias for > user=. username option is handled right now. > Then set it up so that user= generates a warning at mount time > so that people can start moving their options over. Eventually we'd > deprecate that option altogether (make it cause the mount to error out). > > That'll probably take some time since we'll have to phase it in > gradually, probably over a year or more. > > -- > Jeff Layton <[email protected]> > >