Re: CIFS slow on gigabit, doesn't support sockopt=TCP_NODELAY ?
Volker Lendecke <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.file-systems.cifs |
|---|---|
| Organization | SerNet GmbH, Goettingen, Germany |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 09:50:20AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > Yeah. The sockopt= option is completely ignored. I proposed a patch > to remove it not too long ago... > > I'm unclear...so you're saying here that turning on TCP_NODELAY on the > server it helps throughput when using the Linux CIFS client? > > It seems to be that there are probably bottlenecks you'll hit sooner > before Nagle's algorithm becomes an issue (lack of parallelism in > writes for one thing), but it may be worth experimenting with that flag > if you've seen a measurable throughput increase. While there... Any updates on the parallel reads and writes we discussed a couple of months ago? Volker _______________________________________________ linux-cifs-client mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqSnYcACgkQbsgDfmnSbrYRjACfUjtWxA3fKA8lXgSq5tHoB25a Yj4An07u1RkNodx4lBxSQ2LUgByHj+Om =2UVP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----