Re: Question on current state of sec=krb5*integration in cifs.ko
Holger Rauch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.file-systems.cifs |
|---|---|
| Organization | EMPIC GmbH, Werner-von-Siemens-Str. 61, 91052 Erlangen, Germany, Reg. No: 2873 / Fuerth / Germany, CEO / Managing Director: Joerg K. Kottenbrink, WWW: http://www.empic.eu |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Volker,
I looked at
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/UNIX_Extensions
but I couldn't find anything about SMB encryption. Do you have any
good links concerning both SMB signing and encryption (configuring it,
smb.conf options, etc.)?
Are they both part of Samba 3.2.5 (shipped with Debian Lenny) or would
I need a more recent version of Samba?
Volker Lendecke schrieb am Friday, den 23. October 2009:
> [...]
> It's not *as* bad as it sounds security-wise, SMB signing
> attempts to provide integrity, and the Samba extensions for
> SMB encryption (Jeff: Hint...! :-)) would provide
> confidentiality.
>
> Volker
Thanks for enlightening me & kind regards,
Holger
_______________________________________________
linux-cifs-client mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkrh19gACgkQbiVtWpZdKQIksACeP5S1w58/Kn/O8byJ9I1zd+3q La4AnjcBKSqOqX6n+ZeU+2BNNcYmXoas =r1iW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----