Re: Question on current state ofsec=krb5*integration in cifs.ko
Holger Rauch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.file-systems.cifs |
|---|---|
| Organization | EMPIC GmbH, Werner-von-Siemens-Str. 61, 91052 Erlangen, Germany, Reg. No: 2873 / Fuerth / Germany, CEO / Managing Director: Joerg K. Kottenbrink, WWW: http://www.empic.eu |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Volker,
Volker Lendecke schrieb am Friday, den 23. October 2009:
> [...]
> For the server you would say "server signing = mandatory",
> no idea about mount.cifs.
For mount.cifs, specifying sec=krb5i instead of sec=krb5 in my
automount map obviously worked. The file system was automounted as
expected.
Does "server signing = mandatory" also include encryption? I did a
"testparm - v | grep server" and additional option containing
"encryption" was shown, so I guess "server signing" includes both
signing *and* encryption, right?
Thanks for clarifying this & kind regards,
Holger
_______________________________________________
linux-cifs-client mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkrlcloACgkQbiVtWpZdKQI+3wCfaz1OUxrXogvcr5i8rAjpjFRw YTsAnA3wm/wVosu0nfGB3uR1R9wXKlK/ =328X -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----