Re: Question on current stateofsec=krb5*integration in cifs.ko
Holger Rauch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.file-systems.cifs |
|---|---|
| Organization | EMPIC GmbH, Werner-von-Siemens-Str. 61, 91052 Erlangen, Germany, Reg. No: 2873 / Fuerth / Germany, CEO / Managing Director: Joerg K. Kottenbrink, WWW: http://www.empic.eu |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Volker, ok, did the same grep as below, but this time for "crypt". I now came accross a parameter named smb encrypt Is that the right one (from the smb.conf man page it seems to be)? Furthermore, "smb encrypt" seems to include *both* signing and encryption, so one "smb encrypt" is set to mandatory, "server signing = mandatory" should no longer be required, right? Besides, why not rename "server signing" to "smb signing" for consistency (would also make it easier to grep for it)? Greetings, Holger Volker Lendecke schrieb am Monday, den 26. October 2009: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:56:42AM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote: > > [...] > > Does "server signing = mandatory" also include encryption? I did a > > "testparm - v | grep server" and additional option containing > > "encryption" was shown, so I guess "server signing" includes both > > signing *and* encryption, right? > > No. > > Volker -- ========================================= Holger Rauch Entwicklung Anwendungs-Software Systemadministration UNIX Tel.: +49 / 9131 / 877 - 141 Fax: +49 / 9131 / 877 - 266 Email: [email protected] ========================================= _______________________________________________ linux-cifs-client mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-cifs-client
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkrloKAACgkQbiVtWpZdKQIL3wCgl4iN7rFMw4ygDdNdXKNcvaSq V5sAn3FaZ61bc7yBgWdnga5RMxJNyw5C =H2i7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----