Re: should we move the linux-cifs list to vger.kernel.org?
Jeff Layton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.file-systems.cifs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:24:44 +0530 Suresh Jayaraman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 01/19/2010 12:59 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 23:28:26 +0530 > > Suresh Jayaraman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 01/18/2010 05:56 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > >>> Most kernel lists are hosted on vger.kernel.org. The linux-cifs list is > >>> an exception and it has the unfortunate problem that people have to > >>> subscribe to the list before posting (or someone has to moderate their > >>> message). > >>> > >>> vger is more open -- anyone can post to the list, even non-subscribers. > >>> Should we consider moving the list to vger, and just make the existing > >>> address forward to the new one? > >>> > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> Also apart from the fact that almost all kernel subsystems are discussed > >> in vger, the anti-spam filters in vger seem very efficient. > >> > >> OTOH, wondering whether some of the the protocol specific or client > >> behavior specific stuff should get discussed in samba-technical if we > >> plan to move to vger? > >> > >> More idle thoughts.. :) > >> > >> > > > > I was thinking we'd have the kernel.org people set us up a "linux-cifs" > > list and migrate there from [email protected]. We'd > > probably set up the existing list to forward mail to "linux-cifs" and > > maybe think about some way to autorespond to people sending mail to the > > old address and warn them to move their subscription, etc... > > Sounds good. > > > Certainly there's nothing stopping someone from cc'ing samba-technical > > too the same way that people do today for more broad-based protocol > > type questions. > > > > Yes that would help. I thought most of the protocol guys lurk on > samba-technical (and perhaps [email protected]) and they > may not be keen on subscribing to a vger list. But Ccing samba-technical > would help in that case. > The main reason I'm suggesting we do this is because those people wouldn't need to subscribe to the list. The problem with lists.samba.org is that you have to subscribe to a list in order to post to it. vger has no such restriction. -- Jeff Layton <[email protected]>