Re: [PATCH 0/8] cifs: patches for 2.6.35
Suresh Jayaraman <[email protected]> Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:34:57 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.file-systems.cifs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 06/01/2010 08:24 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > Hi Steve, > > The following is a comprehensive set of patches that I have queued up > for 2.6.35. They fix a number of important bugs, including: > > - a page refcount leak introduced in a recent patch by Nick P. > > - a long-standing bug involving busy-file renames > > - a set of fixes for all known "Busy inodes after umount..." problems > (see https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7433) > > It also contains the "drop_inode" patch which helps reduce memory > utilization when server inode numbers aren't used. > > It may be easiest to pull these from my git repo on kernel.org. Pull > request follows: > > The following changes since commit 67a3e12b05e055c0415c556a315a3d3eb637e29e: > Linus Torvalds (1): > Linux 2.6.35-rc1 > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jlayton/linux.git for-sfrench > > Jeff Layton (7): > cifs: fix page refcount leak > cifs: don't attempt busy-file rename unless it's in same directory > cifs: implement drop_inode superblock op > cifs: move cifs_new_fileinfo call out of cifs_posix_open > cifs: pass instantiated filp back after open call > cifs: clean up arguments to cifs_open_inode_helper > cifs: don't call cifs_new_fileinfo unless cifs_open succeeds I have reviewed and tested [4/8], [5/8] [6/8] and [8/8] and I could no longer reproduce the "VFS busy inodes" errors using my reproducer and I don't see the leaks anymore.. Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Suresh Jayaraman <[email protected]> Thanks, -- Suresh Jayaraman