Re: jffs2 fragmentation
Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.drivers.mtd,gmane.linux.file-systems.jffs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 30 October 2003 18:53:08 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Sat, 2003-10-18 at 09:20 -0500, J B wrote: > > Normally, a rm/cp pair takes about 2 minutes on my system. After about 10 > > iterations, the copies begin to take longer, about 3-4 minutes. After > > about 10 iterations they take upwards of 1/2 an hour. > > I suspect you've triggered the worst case of a performance bug which > I've known about for a while. > > We should write new data out to one empty block, while writing out > garbage-collected data out to another. We don't do that at the moment; > we interleave old and new data and then you erase your new file, leaving > us with a very suboptimal mix of valid and obsolete nodes in each > eraseblock we've been writing to. > > I'm still a bit surprised it takes half an hour though. If your explanation is correct, a shift from 4 to 28 minutes would correspond to 6 clean nodes reused for every 1 dirty node deleted and new node written. Doesn't make a lot of sense with a filesystem that should be >80% free or dirty, does it? Jörn -- Fools ignore complexity. Pragmatists suffer it. Some can avoid it. Geniuses remove it. -- Perlis's Programming Proverb #58, SIGPLAN Notices, Sept. 1982 ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/