Re: [PATCH] Prefix each line of multiline printk(KERN_<level> "foo\nbar") with KERN_<level>
Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> Sun, 26 Aug 2007 10:30:41 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.mips.general,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.redhat.blinux.general,gmane.linux.cluster.redhat.cluster.devel,gmane.linux.ports.x86-64.general,gmane.linux.file-systems.jffs,gmane.linux.acpi.devel,gmane.linux.ide,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.drivers.mtd,gmane.linux.scsi,gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.ports.hppa,gmane.linux.hardware.blackfin.kernel.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708261028120.31149@anakin> |
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Joe Perches wrote:
> Corrected printk calls with multiple output lines which
> did not correctly preface each line with KERN_<level>
>
> Fixed uses of some single lines with too many KERN_<level>
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/ecard.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/ecard.c
> @@ -547,7 +547,8 @@ static void ecard_check_lockup(struct irq_desc *desc)
> if (last == jiffies) {
> lockup += 1;
> if (lockup > 1000000) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "\nInterrupt lockup detected - "
> + printk(KERN_ERR "\n"
> + KERN_ERR "Interrupt lockup detected - "
> "disabling all expansion card interrupts\n");
>
> desc->chip->mask(IRQ_EXPANSIONCARD);
What's the purpose of having lines printed with e.g. `KERN_ERR "\n"' only?
Shouldn't these just be removed?
Usually lines starting with `\n' are continuations, but given some other
module may call printk() in between, there's no guarantee continuations
appear on the same line.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds