Re: JFFS vs. JFFS2
Jörn Engel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.file-systems.jffs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 8 September 2003 19:09:15 +0200, Bernhard Roessmann wrote: > > I have some questions reagarding JFFS2 and Axis Etrax100LX/MCM: > > 1) What are the advantages/disadvantages of JFFS2 compared to JFFS? > Am I right if I think, that, in general, it is better to use JFFS2 than > JFFS (on Etrax100LX/MCM)? > > 2) How I can use JFFS2 on Etrax100LX/MCM: > - enable JFFS in kernel config > - maybe editing some makefile/configfile to create > JFFS2 images instead of default JFFS images? > - what else to do? > > Any help would be very appreciated. Long answer: You don't want jffs, unless you know exactly what you're doing. Short answer: Use jffs2. :) Jörn -- Schrödinger's cat is <BLINK>not</BLINK> dead. -- Illiad To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe jffs-dev" in the body of a message to [email protected]