Re: [PATCH 2/2] configfs: unhash the dentry before dropping the item in rmdir

Vasileios Almpanis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.kernel.stable,gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 7/31/26 11:29 AM, Breno Leitao wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 11:30:25AM +0200, Vasileios Almpanis wrote:
>> configfs_get_config_item() treats a hashed dentry as proof that
>> sd->s_element is a live config_item.  configfs_rmdir() breaks that:
>> simple_rmdir() leaves the dentry hashed, the last reference to the item is
>> dropped right after, and the dentry is only unhashed by d_delete() once
>> ->rmdir() has returned.  configfs_symlink() resolves its target holding no
>> lock on it, so get_target() can land in that window:
>>
>>    BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in config_item_get+0x26/0x90
>>     get_target fs/configfs/symlink.c:128 [inline]
>>     configfs_symlink+0x4ab/0x1030 fs/configfs/symlink.c:185
>>
>> Unhash in configfs_remove_dir(), while the item is still guaranteed to be
>> there.  A reference obtained just before that stays harmless, as
>> create_link() rechecks CONFIGFS_USET_DROPPING, already set by
>> configfs_detach_prep().  Both configfs_unregister_subsystem() paths
>> d_drop() after detaching, so this only makes rmdir match them.
> Is the claim that "a reference obtained just before that stays harmless,
> as create_link() rechecks CONFIGFS_USET_DROPPING" accurate?
I believe so.  Everything configfs_remove_dir() will now d_drop(), had
DROPPING set on its dirent beforehand by configfs_detach_prep(), and
once detach_prep() has succeeded the flag is never cleared again on
that subtree.

The race is closed by configfs_dirent_lock. create_link() checks DROPPING
and incs ->s_links in one locked section, and detach_prep() set DROPPING
and checks ->s_links in another. Either symlink gets ->s_links++ in 
first and
rmdir fails with -EBUSY before unhashing, or DROPPING is set first and
create_link() fails with -ENOENT.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.