Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add myself as UFS filesystem maintainer

Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.file-systems,gmane.linux.kernel
Message-ID <2zlxynjoguy2zlrxcsrylkhuz4iit73mul66ddqzaqvodyde2i@be4rxu76tbbf>
On Mon 03-08-26 09:44:10, Ali Ahmet Memis wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 10:57:14AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > I'm a bit curious: Are you using UFS driver in Linux? Or do you know of
> > anybody using it?
> 
> Yes. I run FreeBSD on a second machine that I keep as a small server, and
> its disks are UFS2. I mount those from my Linux box with the in-tree ufs
> driver to read data off them, which on Linux is read-only for UFS2. So the
> driver is not theoretical for me, it is how I reach my own data.

Cool! When real users are fixing what they are using the results are
usually better than if it is just "close a couple of syzbot bugs" :).

> More generally that is what the driver is for: reading FreeBSD, NetBSD,
> OpenBSD and Solaris disks from Linux. Anyone dual booting a BSD, migrating
> data off one, or doing recovery or forensics on a BSD or Solaris volume
> ends up here. It is a small user base but not an empty one, and it is the
> only in-tree way to do it.

Yep, I was expecting some real users still do exist but I didn't hear about
anybody for a long time :).

> That is also why the mount path bugs bother me. The images I feed it are
> real BSD volumes, sometimes left unclean after a crash, so an unusual but
> legitimate on-disk layout should not panic the kernel. The fixes I have
> been sending are all in that parse and mount path.

Sure.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.