Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] parisc: Drop own implementations for ptep_get() and ptep_test_and_clear_young()
"Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 13:42:51 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.parisc,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.file-systems |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <anHd7ho3daZFZ-4r@lucifer> |
On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 01:34:41PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 12:11:08PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 05:43:56PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote: > > > From: Helge Deller <[email protected]> > > > > > > Switch to the generic implementations, which are identical. > > > > You sure do like succinct commit messages :) > > I didn't even write this one! See the From: :)) Lol well then feedback addressed to Helge ;) > > > > > Maybe worth saying by dropping the __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_TEST_AND_CLEAR_YOUNG and > > ptep_get defines you get the generic versions from include/pgtable.h which are > > functionally identical. > > > > I can touch it up though, if you insist. Yeah, I'm being pedantic here it's not vital to have this change :) but be nice if you could, I'm sure Helge probably wouldn't mind too much? :) > > > (Being pedantic, they're not quite strictly identical as the > > ptep_test_and_clear_young() generic function does some weird unnecessary > > indirection with a local variable and the single {} is dropped etc.) > > > > > > > > Suggested-by: Usama Arif <[email protected]> > > > Suggested-by: John David Anglin <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Pedro Falcato <[email protected]> > > > > Nits above notwithstanding, LGTM so: > > > > Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <[email protected]> > > Thanks! > > -- > Pedro -- Cheers, Lorenzo