Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] parisc: Drop own implementations for ptep_get() and ptep_test_and_clear_young()

"Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 13:42:51 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.ppc64.devel,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.parisc,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.file-systems
Message-ID <anHd7ho3daZFZ-4r@lucifer>
On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 01:34:41PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 12:11:08PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 05:43:56PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote:
> > > From: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Switch to the generic implementations, which are identical.
> >
> > You sure do like succinct commit messages :)
>
> I didn't even write this one! See the From: :))

Lol well then feedback addressed to Helge ;)

>
> >
> > Maybe worth saying by dropping the __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_TEST_AND_CLEAR_YOUNG and
> > ptep_get defines you get the generic versions from include/pgtable.h which are
> > functionally identical.
> >
>
> I can touch it up though, if you insist.

Yeah, I'm being pedantic here it's not vital to have this change :) but be nice
if you could, I'm sure Helge probably wouldn't mind too much? :)

>
> > (Being pedantic, they're not quite strictly identical as the
> > ptep_test_and_clear_young() generic function does some weird unnecessary
> > indirection with a local variable and the single {} is dropped etc.)
> >
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Usama Arif <[email protected]>
> > > Suggested-by: John David Anglin <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Pedro Falcato <[email protected]>
> >
> > Nits above notwithstanding, LGTM so:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Pedro

--
Cheers, Lorenzo