Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] parisc: Drop own implementations for ptep_get() and ptep_test_and_clear_young()

Helge Deller <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 15:00:43 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.parisc,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.file-systems
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/4/26 14:42, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 01:34:41PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 12:11:08PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 05:43:56PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote:
>>>> From: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> Switch to the generic implementations, which are identical.
>>>
>>> You sure do like succinct commit messages :)
>>
>> I didn't even write this one! See the From: :))
>=20
> Lol well then feedback addressed to Helge ;)

Noted :-)

>>> Maybe worth saying by dropping the __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_TEST_AND_CLEAR_YOU=
NG and
>>> ptep_get defines you get the generic versions from include/pgtable.h w=
hich are
>>> functionally identical.

Isn't that basically the same as:
"Switch to the generic implementations, which are identical."
;-)

>> I can touch it up though, if you insist.
>=20
> Yeah, I'm being pedantic here it's not vital to have this change :) but =
be nice
> if you could, I'm sure Helge probably wouldn't mind too much? :)

Yes, I'm fine with any cleanup/rephrasing of the commit message.
Thanks!
Helge

>>> (Being pedantic, they're not quite strictly identical as the
>>> ptep_test_and_clear_young() generic function does some weird unnecessa=
ry
>>> indirection with a local variable and the single {} is dropped etc.)