Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] parisc: Drop own implementations for ptep_get() and ptep_test_and_clear_young()
Helge Deller <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 15:00:43 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.parisc,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.file-systems |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 8/4/26 14:42, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 01:34:41PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 12:11:08PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 05:43:56PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote: >>>> From: Helge Deller <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> Switch to the generic implementations, which are identical. >>> >>> You sure do like succinct commit messages :) >> >> I didn't even write this one! See the From: :)) >=20 > Lol well then feedback addressed to Helge ;) Noted :-) >>> Maybe worth saying by dropping the __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_TEST_AND_CLEAR_YOU= NG and >>> ptep_get defines you get the generic versions from include/pgtable.h w= hich are >>> functionally identical. Isn't that basically the same as: "Switch to the generic implementations, which are identical." ;-) >> I can touch it up though, if you insist. >=20 > Yeah, I'm being pedantic here it's not vital to have this change :) but = be nice > if you could, I'm sure Helge probably wouldn't mind too much? :) Yes, I'm fine with any cleanup/rephrasing of the commit message. Thanks! Helge >>> (Being pedantic, they're not quite strictly identical as the >>> ptep_test_and_clear_young() generic function does some weird unnecessa= ry >>> indirection with a local variable and the single {} is dropped etc.)