Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] parisc: Drop own implementations for ptep_get() and ptep_test_and_clear_young()
"Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:03:47 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded,gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.ports.parisc,gmane.linux.kernel.mm,gmane.linux.file-systems |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <anHi9n3_8bLjAsxy@lucifer> |
On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 03:00:43PM +0200, Helge Deller wrote: > On 8/4/26 14:42, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 01:34:41PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 12:11:08PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 05:43:56PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote: > > > > > From: Helge Deller <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > Switch to the generic implementations, which are identical. > > > > > > > > You sure do like succinct commit messages :) > > > > > > I didn't even write this one! See the From: :)) > > > > Lol well then feedback addressed to Helge ;) > > Noted :-) > > > > > Maybe worth saying by dropping the __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_TEST_AND_CLEAR_YOUNG and > > > > ptep_get defines you get the generic versions from include/pgtable.h which are > > > > functionally identical. > > Isn't that basically the same as: > "Switch to the generic implementations, which are identical." > ;-) I am being _exceedingly_, possibly outrageously pedantic here :>) > > > > I can touch it up though, if you insist. > > > > Yeah, I'm being pedantic here it's not vital to have this change :) but be nice > > if you could, I'm sure Helge probably wouldn't mind too much? :) > > Yes, I'm fine with any cleanup/rephrasing of the commit message. Thanks :) > Thanks! > Helge > > > > > (Being pedantic, they're not quite strictly identical as the > > > > ptep_test_and_clear_young() generic function does some weird unnecessary > > > > indirection with a local variable and the single {} is dropped etc.) -- Cheers, Lorenzo